Anselm of Canterbury in 1078 in his Proslogion, defined God
as "that than which nothing greater can be conceived", if the greatest possible being exists in
the mind, it must also exist in reality. If it only exists in the mind,
a greater being is possible—one which exists in the mind and in reality
Leibniz saw perfection as impossible to analyse; therefore,
it would be impossible to demonstrate that all perfections are incompatible
Sadra the mighty Islamic Scholar spoke thusly
1.There is existence
2.Existence is a perfection above which no perfection may be
conceived
3.God is perfection and perfection in existence
4.Existence is a singular and simple reality; there is no
metaphysical pluralism
5.That singular reality is graded in intensity in a scale of
perfection (that is, a denial of a pure monism).
6.That scale must have a limit point, a point of greatest
intensity and of greatest existence.
7.Hence God exists.
Although there are many more modern examples of the
Ontological argument, I will deal with these firstly.
that than which
nothing greater can be conceived
Scripture tells us that “Monkey is superior to his peers”
This means amongst the gods
he is superior. Superiority is a definition of having greater attributes. But
note! Monkey is SUPERIOR to ALL his peers. Who are his peers? Gods and
Demigods. He knows 72 forms of shape shifting. Pigsy a Heavenly General
knows only 36. What is a general? It is a soldier who has achieved greatness
in rank and position by superiority over his foes and indeed his peers. Monkey
has superiority over even a General such as Pigsy.
That Monkey exists in the mind, as he must, as you have just
thought of him, thus he EXISTS IN REALITY.
As to Leibniz’s argument, I see little point in dwelling
upon this. The evidence is readily available to those who do not close their
minds.
Scripture tells us that Sun Wukong pissed on the fingers of Buddha
as he traversed the Buddha’s hand. The Bhudda who is acknowledged as perfection
of mind and spirit actually was pissed on by Sun Wukong.
Pissing on people is a sign of dominance. At least I think
it is. I might be utterly making all this shit up, but yeah it feels right, and
that peeps is FAITH. You cant touch me now!
If by Leibniz’s argument perfection is not measurable, then
what is his argument for Monkey Pissing on Buddha fingers and showing the Buddha
as imperfect? He also wrote “Monkey was here” on his fingers. This establishes dominance.
As for Sadra I will leave that for another Day.
May Monkeys spirit be Irrepressible to you
No comments:
Post a Comment